Even today (some would say especially today) in 21st century
America, a great many of us shun the exploration of issues that challenge
our comfortable political and societal paradigms. In retreat from unwelcome
ideas, we dodge, weave and bluster to eschew painful fact, and then seek
shelter behind consoling slogans and easy-to-digest illusions.
What then must we do to join the debate and exercise effective
citizenship? First, never take as gospel anything anybody says until
we’ve checked it out ourselves. Second, insist that extraordinary
claims require extraordinary proofs. When the war protestor on the corner
says, "In the 1970s, America conducted a murderous illegal three-year
campaign of mass bombing in Cambodia that left millions dead in its wake," check
it out, be skeptical and require extraordinary proof of that claim. When
President Bush says, "Iraq is developing a nuclear weapons program, and
the smoking gun may come to America in the form of a mushroom cloud," check
that out, too and require extraordinary proof of that claim.
A good citizen is skeptical of the motivations of the powerful.
She should scrutinize, question and criticize when necessary, and she
should be free to do so without being branded unpatriotic or a traitor.
Many Americans who criticize their government have recognized that the
first duty of a patriot is to love her country all the time and criticize
its leaders when they are wrong. According to Thomas Jefferson, "Dissent
is the highest form of patriotism." In pursuit of that model, dissidents
in our nation not satisfied with what America is, look to what America
could be and despair when its leaders put profit and the lust for power
over the well being of the people.
Is it unpatriotic to question authority and speak truth
to power? Many say so, but history doesn’t bear them out. Julius
Caesar, absolute ruler of the known world two thousand years ago, spoke
of the folly of blindly following leaders this way: "Beware of the leader
who bangs the drums of war to whip the citizenry into patriotic fervor.
Patriotism emboldens the blood just as it narrows the mind. Citizens
infused with fear and blinded by patriotism will offer up all their rights
unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this I have done. I
am Caesar."
The danger of pledging unquestioned allegiance to people
in power is summed up in these words by Rudolph Hess in 1934: "One man
remains beyond all criticism, and that is The Fuhrer. This is because
everyone senses and knows he is always right, and he will always be right.
The National Socialism of all of us is anchored in uncritical loyalty
and surrender to the Fuhrer." To which Hitler later replied, "What
good fortune for those in power that the common people do not think!"
Critical thinking - questioning authority - demanding proof
- ascertaining fact - holding leaders accountable - peeking behind the
curtain to catch a glimpse of the wizard - are precisely the freedoms
that make our country special. However, to be an enlightened critical
thinker takes time away from the T.V. set and the cocktail hour. More
significantly, it takes courage to look without illusion at where our
nation is now and how it got there. No one likes being reminded that
the United States, founded on the principles of freedom and liberty,
was the last major nation to end chattel slavery, an institution of the
wealthy, and legally protected racism continued for a century beyond
that. Is it satisfying to learn that in the land of the free, women were
granted the right to vote only after Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kyrgyzstan
and 22 other nations had accepted women into the affairs of government
first? It’s certainly not pleasant to contemplate that the U.S.
government violated hundreds of treaties and not counting the World Wars,
conducted bloody armed incursions into scores of nations. Harsh reality
has an ugly face, and persons who ignore or outright deny inconvenient
fact cannot learn from it and can never be a reliable steward of today’s
America. The citizen who knows something of our nation’s history
and understands the motives and outcomes of past policy is much more
likely to be skeptical of, for example, an unprovoked war in Iraq.
Critical thinking - questioning authority - demanding proof
- ascertaining fact - holding leaders accountable - peeking behind the
curtain - the cardinal virtues of citizenship, have been lauded since
the time of Aristotle, and it is precisely this method of critical examination
and evaluation intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn and others
purport. Chomsky often says that power centers - whether corporate or
government - will always act in ways that protect and support their power
positions. For them to do anything else, he says, would be illogical.
That being the case, if the citizens of a functioning democracy seek
to battle injustice, despotism, incompetence and superstition, if they
wish for better schools and a respect for learning, science, scholarship
and invention, if they wish their children to have a high standard of
living and jobs that pay fair wages, then they need vigorously to challenge
national institutions, policies and dogmas, however persuasively packaged
and eloquently pitched to the public. The nation benefits not from illusory
glorification of the past or from defending national icons. The nation
benefits when its citizens question authority, face fact and devise and
impose strategies to carry them through inevitable societal change. An
informed, independent and active citizenry is what separates us from
the totalitarian states. We should all speak truth to power.